Diagnostic Imaging Pathways - Adrenal Mass (Incidental On CT)
- Pathway Home
- Pathway
- Images
- Teaching Points
- hs1
- hs2
- hs3
- hs4
- hs5
- hs6
- hs7
- hs8
- hs9
- References
- Information for Consumers
- copyright
Pathway Home
Population Covered By The Guidance
This pathway provides guidance for further investigating adult patients with an incidental adrenal mass detected on computed tomography.
Date reviewed: September 2015
Date of next review: 2017/2018
Published: March 2016
Quick User Guide
Move the mouse cursor over the PINK text boxes inside the flow chart to bring up a pop up box with salient points.
Clicking on the PINK text box will bring up the full text.
The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.
SYMBOL | RRL | EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE |
![]() |
None | 0 |
![]() |
Minimal | < 1 millisieverts |
![]() |
Low | 1-5 mSv |
![]() |
Medium | 5-10 mSv |
![]() |
High | >10 mSv |
Images
Teaching Points
Teaching Points
- Incidental adenomas ("incidentalomas") are found in up to 5% of scans done for other indications
- The first stage in investigating the significance of the mass is biochemical screening for Cushing's syndrome, phaeochromocytoma and hyperaldosteronism
- CT is the initial imaging modality to investigate the characteristics of the mass
- The aim of imaging is to determine whether the mass is a carcinoma, as early identification can lead to biopsy and potentially curative surgical resection
- Follow-up of a lesion, to assess growth characteristics as well as biochemical activity is crucial
hs1
Adrenal Mass (Incidental On CT)
- An adrenal 'incidentaloma' is defined as a mass or nodule 10mm or greater in size found on a CT scan (or other imaging) performed for an indication other than the evaluation of the adrenal glands. Patients with known primary malignancies that potentially metastasise to the adrenals are therefore excluded from this definition
- Modern imaging can detect nodules less than 10mm. The management of these latter lesions is unclear. Recent consensus guidelines suggest follow up clinically, but not radiologically, unless a biochemical abnormality is discovered. 1 However, it is uncertain whether in the absence of clinical indicators whether all these patients should be investigated biochemically
- Incidental adrenal masses are found in up to 4-5% of CT and MRI scans, 2 reaching 10% or more in elderly patients (i.e. the prevalence increases with age) 3
- A recent review 1 of consensus guidelines drawn up by the US National Institute of Health, the American College of Radiology 4 and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons 5 summarized the relevant questions that require answering when investigating an incidental adrenal nodule
- Is the lesion benign or malignant? If it is likely to be malignant, is it a metastasis or an adrenal carcinoma?
- Is it a phaeochromocytoma
- If it is an adenoma, is it functioning / secreting?
- In patients with no known primary malignancy, the likelihood of an adrenal nodule being malignant is less than 0.5%, whereas in a patient with a known malignancy, the prevalence is 25-36% 1
- Primary adenocarcinoma of the adrenals is rare
- The prevalence of the different causes of incidental lesions varies widely in the literature and is controversial. 6 In 2002, the National Institute of Health state-of-the-science statement, indicated that adenomas account for 41% of adrenal incidentalomas, metastases 19%, adrenocortical carcinoma 10%, myelolipoma 9%, and pheochromocytoma 8%, with other usually benign lesions, such as adrenal cysts, comprising the remainder. 7 In a review published in 2008, adenomas constituted 75% of all lesions, myelolipomas 6%, hematomas 4%, cysts 1%, pheochromocytomas 0.3%, and cortisol-producing adenoma 0.1% were found incidentally 8
- Myelolipomas, haematomas and cysts can be accurately diagnosed on their specific imaging appearance
- Further investigation of an incidentally found adrenal mass will depend on clinical suspicion based on patient characteristics and clinical background and will consist of clinical, biochemical, and radiological evaluation to establish the lesion’s secretory status and risk of malignancy 9
- Imaging phenotype and mass size are the two major predictors of malignancy in incidental adrenal lesions 10
- The commonest malignant adrenal lesion is a metastasis. Primary adrenal adenocarcinomas are rare. 10% of phaeochromocytomas are malignant (and 10% bilateral) 1
- A study of patients with no known malignancy and no suspicion for a hyperfunctioning adrenal mass found that imaging provided a specific diagnosis in 87% of all adrenal masses, of which 62% were diagnostic on the original CT 8
- The large majority of incidentally discovered adrenal adenomas are non-functioning. Of those that are functioning, increased cortisol production is the commonest abnormality, causing ‘sub-clinical’ Cushing’s syndrome or ‘metabolic syndrome’ (increased frequency of hypertension, central obesity, impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes, hyperlipemia and osteoporosis). 11 These patients have an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. 12,13 Other functioning lesions may secrete mineralocorticoids or catercholamines ( i.e. phaeochromocytoma) 14
- Patients with bilateral adrenal incidentalomas are considerably more likely to have functioning adenomas, especially hypercortisolism - 22% versus 6% for those with unilateral adenomas 15
hs2
Computed Tomography (CT) of Adrenal Nodules / Masses
- 75% of incidental adrenal nodules are adenomas. They contain a variable degree of intra-cytoplasmic lipid, leading to the imaging features indicated below
- Features consistent with a benign adrenal lesion are
- Unenhanced CT (i.e. scan performed without IV iodinated contrast) attenuation of less than 10 Hounsfield Units (71% sensitivity and >99% specificity) 16,17
- The presence of negative pixels on contrast enhanced CT was found to have 100% specificity and sensitivity of 52.9% that the lesion was benign in one study 18
- About 25% of adrenal adenomas do not contain enough lipid to be diagnosed on unenhanced CT scan, so-called lipid-poor adenomas. For these lesions with unenhanced CT attenuation values >10, an 'adrenal protocol' CT scan with IV contrast can be performed. The protocol consists of measuring initial CT contrast enhancement and absolute percentage washout ([enhanced - delayed]/[enhanced - unenhanced] x 100) greater than 60% or relative percentage washout ([enhanced - delayed]/enhanced x 100]) greater than 40% at 5-15minutes on imaging (98% sensitivity and specificity of 92%). 19,20,21 An alternative to 'adrenal protocol CT' or in patients in whom this protocol is equivocal is Chemical Shift MRI scan. Very occasionally adrenal metastases in patients with renal cell cancer or hepatocellular cancer can exhibit similar 'washout' of contrast to adrenal adenomas. Therefore, if the patient is subsequently shown to have either of these malignancies, follow-up of the adrenal lesion for increase in size is prudent 22
- Recent studies suggest that dual energy CT is effective in detecting lipid-rich adenomas 23
- Adrenal myelolipomas are usually asymptomatic. They contain mature adipose tissue recognizable on CT and MRI (macroscopic fat). Larger lesions can spontaneously bleed. 24 It is generally accepted that myelolipomas over 4cm in diameter have an increased risk of bleeding and should be excised - although the evidence appears anecdotal
- Features suggestive of malignancy include
- Heterogeneity, necrosis, or irregular margins, or if it can be shown to have enlarged
- Imaging phenotype and mass size are the two major predictors of malignancy in incidental adrenal lesions 10
- Primary adenocarcinoma of the adrenals is rare
hs3
Chemical Shift Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) 19,25,26
- MRI is useful for imaging of CT-indeterminate adrenal lesions and has 93% accuracy for differentiating benign from malignant adrenal masses
- Chemical shift MRI (CS-MRI) is more sensitive than unenhanced CT for intra-cytoplasmic lipid content and can diagnose many of the nodules that demonstrate HU of between 10 and 30 as lipid rich adenomas
- Benign adrenal cortical adenomas lose signal on out-of-phase images but appear relatively bright on in-phase images, indicating their lipid content
hs4
18Fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) - Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography (PET / CT) Scan
- 18FDG-PET/CT scan is useful for
- Confirming the malignancy of a lesion. It can differentiate benign from malignant incidentally discovered adrenal lesions with high sensitivity (73–100%) and specificity (70–100%) 27,28,29,30
- Detecting an occult primary malignancy when adrenal metastases are suspected
- Detecting other extra-adrenal metastases which may affect management of the adrenal lesion
- It should be noted that a small proportion of benign adrenal cortical adenomas may show FDG uptake greater than liver back- ground, often but not always in secretory masses. Similarly, benign pheochromocytomas will also show increased FDG uptake 28,31
hs5
Biopsy 1
- Greater than 90% accurate for malignant lesions when adequate sample available
- Most useful in patients with known extra-adrenal malignancies who are risk of adrenal metastases (particularly carcinoma of the lung, pancreas, liver and stomach)
- Potential complications include pneumothorax, bleeding, tumour tracking, infection, adrenal abscess formation
- Percutaneous biopsy is not recommended when adrenocortical carcinoma is suspected as there is a risk of tumour spillage
- Phaeochromocytoma must be excluded clinically and biochemically before biopsy, since a hypertensive crisis may be precipitated by biopsy in patients with this condition
hs6
Clinical And Biochemical Assessment 5,7,32
- The prevalence of hormonally active adenomas amongst incidentally discovered adrenal lesions is difficult to assess, due to biases in the published literature. 6 A review of the literature published in 2009 suggested that with the exception of sub-clinical Cushing’s syndrome, the prevalence has been overestimated, as has the likelihood of primary adenocarcinoma of the adrenal 6
- Patients with bilateral adrenal incidentalomas are considerably more likely to have functioning adenomas, especially hypercortisolism - 22%, versus 6% for those with unilateral adenomas 15
- There is controversy as to the cost-effectiveness of all patients with incidental adrenal lesions or whether selected patients should be assessed biochemically 33,34, and the extent of testing, but there appears to be expert consensus that patients with incidental nodules or masses that are not obviously myelolipomas, cysts or metastases should be assessed to determine whether the lesions are hormonally functioning
- A recent study suggests that it is most efficient to test patients for hormonally functioning lesions early on in the diagnostic algorithm 35
- The large majority of incidentally discovered adrenal adenomas are non-functioning. Of those that are functioning, increased cortisol production is the commonest abnormality, causing 'sub-clinical' Cushing’s syndrome or ‘metabolic syndrome’ (increased frequency of hypertension, central obesity, impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes, hyperlipemia and osteoporosis). 11 These patients have an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. 12,13 Other functioning lesions may secrete mineralocorticoids or catercholamines ( i.e. phaeochromocytoma) 14
- Subclinical Cushing's syndrome has been shown to be the most common hormonal abnormality in patients with incidental adrenal masses found on CT. A multicenter trial of 1096 cases of adrenal incidentaloma showed that 85% were nonfunctioning, 9% secreted cortisol and caused subclinical Cushing's syndrome, 4% were phaeochromocytomas (less than half caused hypertension) and 2% were aldosteronomas (Conn’s syndrome) 36
- For phaeochromocytoma, plasma or urinary metanephrines assessment are the most reliable tests, with sensitivity and specificity of around 95% 37
- For increased cortisol secretion, patients should undergo an overnight 1mg dexamethasone suppression test
- Aldosterone hypersecretion (Conn’s syndrome) causes hypertension and, typically, hypokalaemia, but the latter is uncommon in patients with asymptomatic adrenal adenomas. In patients with adrenal incidentalomas and hypertension, serum potassium and plasma aldosterone: plasma renin ratios should be measured
hs7
Follow-up of Incidental Adrenal Lesions
- Follow-up is directed at showing increase in size of the lesion (which may indicate malignancy) and / or the development of hormonal activity
- 87% of adrenal incidentalomas remained stable in size in one study, although in others 0-26% increase in diameter by >1cm over time. 38 The risk of developing adrenal adenocarcinoma is exceedingly low. The cumulative risk of a non-secreting incidental adenoma developing subclinical hyperfunction has been estimated to be 3.8% after 1 year and 6.6% after 5 years. 39 The likelihood of developing hormonal dysfunction increases steeply in the first 3 years of follow-up and then tends to plateau. Patients with masses > 3cm and / or with subclinical Cushing’s syndrome at baseline were more likely to develop overt hormonal dysfunction over time. However, a further study reported a cumulative risk of developing endocrine abnormalities of 17% at 1 year and 29% at 5 years 40
- With regard to both imaging and biochemical follow-up, the most appropriate follow-up strategy is not clear. Suggested strategies vary from a minimalist 6,33 to an intensive approach 5
- An example of an intensive approach is contained in The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons guidelines suggest that for a nodule measuring more than 1 cm and less than 4 cm, repeat imaging with non-contrast CT should be performed at 3-6 months and annually for one to two years 5
- With regard to hormonal status, it has been suggested that a 1mg dexamethsone suppression test be repeated annually for at least 4 years, 7 but other expert opinion suggests that hormonal follow-up of patients with masses <2 cm is probably of limited utility because such small tumours are usually non-secreting and rarely progress as to size and function 33
- An approach individualized to the patient would appear to be reasonable, based on patient’s age, co-morbidity and the confidence of the lesion being benign on initial imaging
hs8
Features Suggesting Malignancy
- Heterogeneity, necrosis, or irregular margins, or if it can be shown to have enlarged
- Imaging phenotype and mass size are the two major predictors of malignancy in incidental adrenal lesions 10
- Primary adenocarcinoma of the adrenals is rare
hs9
Features Suggesting Benignity
- CT attenuation <10 Hounsfield Units on unenhanced CT
- 'Washout' of contrast on delayed post-contrast CT scan
- Loss of signal intensity on out-of-phase T1 weighted MR images, compared to in-phase signal intensity
References
References
Date of literature search: September 2015
The search methodology is available on request. Email
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- Willatt J, Chong S, Ruma JA, Kuriakose J. Incidental adrenal nodules and masses: the imaging approach. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:410185. (Review article). View the reference
- Song JH, Mayo-Smith WW. Incidentally discovered adrenal mass. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011;49(2):361-8. (Review article). View the reference
- Minnaar EM, Human KE, Henneman D, Nio CY, Bisschop PH, Nieveen van Dijkum EJ. An adrenal incidentaloma: how often is it detected and what are the consequences? ISRN Radiol. 2013;2013:871959. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Choyke PL.ACR appropriateness criteria on incidentally discovered adrenal mass. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3(7):498-504. (Guidelines). View the reference
- Zeiger MA, Thompson GB, Duh QY, Hamrahian AH, Angelos P, Elaraj D, et al. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons medical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentalomas. Endocr Pract. 2009;15 Suppl 1:1-20. (Guidelines). View the reference
- Cawood TJ, Hunt PJ, O'Shea D, Cole D, Soule S. Recommended evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is costly, has high false-positive rates and confers a risk of fatal cancer that is similar to the risk of the adrenal lesion becoming malignant; time for a rethink? Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(4):513-27. (Review article). View the reference
- Health NIo. NIH state-of-the-science statement on management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma"). NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(2):1-25. (Review article). View the reference
- Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW. The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(5):1163-8. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Ioachimescu AG, Remer EM, Hamrahian AH. Adrenal incidentalomas: a disease of modern technology offering opportunities for improved patient care. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2015;44(2):335-54. (Review article). View the reference
- Young WF, Jr. Clinical practice. The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(6):601-10. (Review article). View the reference
- De Leo M, Cozzolino A, Colao A, Pivonello R. Subclinical Cushing's syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26(4):497-505. (Review article). View the reference
- Di Dalmazi G, Vicennati V, Garelli S, Casadio E, Rinaldi E, Giampalma E, et al. Cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with adrenal incidentalomas that are either non-secreting or associated with intermediate phenotype or subclinical Cushing's syndrome: a 15-year retrospective study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(5):396-405. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Di Dalmazi G, Pasquali R, Beuschlein F, Reincke M. Subclinical hypercortisolism: a state, a syndrome, or a disease? Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(4):M61-71. (Review article). View the reference
- Mannelli M, Lenders JW, Pacak K, Parenti G, Eisenhofer G. Subclinical phaeochromocytoma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26(4):507-15. (Review article). View the reference
- Pasternak JD, Seib CD, Seiser N, Tyrell JB, Liu C, Cisco RM, et al. Differences between bilateral adrenal incidentalomas and unilateral lesions. JAMA Surg. 2015:1683. [Epub ahead of print]. (Level III/IV evidence). View the reference
- Boland GW, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR. Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(1):201-4. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Hamrahian AH, Ioachimescu AG, Remer EM, Motta-Ramirez G, Bogabathina H, Levin HS, et al. Clinical utility of noncontrast computed tomography attenuation value (hounsfield units) to differentiate adrenal adenomas/hyperplasias from nonadenomas: Cleveland Clinic experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(2):871-7. (Level III/IV evidence). View the reference
- Bae KT, Fuangtharnthip P, Prasad SR, Joe BN, Heiken JP. Adrenal masses: CT characterization with histogram analysis method. Radiology. 2003;228(3):735-42. (Level III/IV evidence). View the reference
- Boland GW, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Mayo-Smith WW. Incidental adrenal lesions: principles, techniques, and algorithms for imaging characterization. Radiology. 2008;249(3):756-75. (Review article). View the reference
- Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Dunnick NR. Delayed enhanced CT of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(5):1411-5. (Level III/IV evidence). View the reference
- Kumagae Y, Fukukura Y, Takumi K, Shindo T, Tateyama A, Kamiyama T, et al. Distinguishing adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas on dynamic enhanced CT: a comparison of 5 and 10 min delays after intravenous contrast medium injection. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(7):696-703. (Level III/IV evidence). View the reference
- Choi YA, Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B. Evaluation of adrenal metastases from renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: use of delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology. 2013;266(2):514-20. (Level III/IV evidence). View the reference
- Helck A, Hummel N, Meinel FG, Johnson T, Nikolaou K, Graser A. Can single-phase dual-energy CT reliably identify adrenal adenomas? Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1636-42. (Level III/IV evidence). View the reference
- Kenney PJ, Wagner BJ, Rao P, Heffess CS. Myelolipoma: CT and pathologic features. Radiology. 1998;208(1):87-95. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Fujiyoshi F, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, Tsuchimochi S. Characterization of adrenal tumors by chemical shift fast low-angle shot MR imaging: comparison of four methods of quantitative evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(6):1649-57. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Haider MA, Ghai S, Jhaveri K, Lockwood G. Chemical shift MR imaging of hyperattenuating (>10 HU) adrenal masses: does it still have a role? Radiology. 2004;231(3):711-6. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Kim JY, Kim SH, Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Kim YH, Cho SH, et al. Utilisation of combined 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant adrenal enlargement. Br J Radiol. 2013;86(1028):20130190. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Wong KK, Arabi M, Bou-Assaly W, Marzola MC, Rubello D, Gross MD. Evaluation of incidentally discovered adrenal masses with PET and PET/CT. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(3):441-50. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Lee HJ, Lee J. Differential diagnosis of adrenal mass using imaging modality: special emphasis on f-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2014;29(1):5-11. (Review article). View the reference
- Groussin L, Bonardel G, Silvera S, Tissier F, Coste J, Abiven G, et al. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors: a prospective study in 77 operated patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(5):1713-22. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Takanami K, Kaneta T, Morimoto R, Satoh F, Nakamura Y, Takase K, et al. Characterization of lipid-rich adrenal tumors by FDG PET/CT: are they hormone-secreting or not? Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(2):145-53. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Fuller PJ. Adrenal diagnostics: an endocrinologist's perspective focused on hyperaldosteronism. Clin Biochem Rev. 2013;34(3):111-6. (Review article). View the reference
- Aron D, Terzolo M, Cawood TJ. Adrenal incidentalomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26(1):69-82. (Review article). View the reference
- Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, Mayo-Smith WW, Megibow AJ, Yee J, et al. Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(10):754-73. (Guidelines). View the reference
- Birsen O, Akyuz M, Dural C, Aksoy E, Aliyev S, Mitchell J, et al. A new risk stratification algorithm for the management of patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Surgery. 2014;156(4):959-65. (Level III/IV evidence). View the reference
- Mantero F, Terzolo M, Arnaldi G, Osella G, Masini AM, Ali A, et al. A survey on adrenal incidentaloma in Italy. Study Group on Adrenal Tumors of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(2):637-44. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, Linehan WM, Mannelli M, Friberg P, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best? JAMA. 2002;287(11):1427-34. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Bulow B, Jansson S, Juhlin C, Steen L, Thoren M, Wahrenberg H, et al. Adrenal incidentaloma - follow-up results from a Swedish prospective study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(3):419-23. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Barzon L, Fallo F, Sonino N, Boscaro M. Development of overt Cushing's syndrome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146(1):61-6. (Level IV/V evidence). View the reference
- Libe R, Dall'Asta C, Barbetta L, Baccarelli A, Beck-Peccoz P, Ambrosi B. Long-term follow-up study of patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;147(4):489-94. (Level III evidence). View the reference
Information for Consumers
Information for Consumers
Information from this website |
Information from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists’ website |
Consent to Procedure or Treatment Radiation Risks of X-rays and Scans |
Iodine-Containing Contrast Medium Radiation Risk of Medical Imaging During Pregnancy Radiation Risk of Medical Imaging for Adults and Children |
copyright
Copyright
© Copyright 2015, Department of Health Western Australia. All Rights Reserved. This web site and its content has been prepared by The Department of Health, Western Australia. The information contained on this web site is protected by copyright.
Legal Notice
Please remember that this leaflet is intended as general information only. It is not definitive and The Department of Health, Western Australia can not accept any legal liability arising from its use. The information is kept as up to date and accurate as possible, but please be warned that it is always subject to change
.File Formats
Some documents for download on this website are in a Portable Document Format (PDF). To read these files you might need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.