Diagnostic Imaging Pathways - Breast Screening

References

1. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy S, Day N. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. J Epidemiol Community Health 1989;43:107-14. (Level II evidence). Click here to view reference
2. Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ 1988;297:943-8. (Level II evidence). Click here to view reference
3. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. Ten to fourteen year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982;69:349-55. (Level II evidence). Click here to view reference
4. Irwig L, Glasziou P, Barratt AL, Salkeld G. Review of the evidence about the value of mammographic screening in 40-49 year old women. Woolloomooloo (NSW): National Breast Cancer Centre, 1997. (Review article)
5. Breast Imaging: a guide for practice. National Breast Cancer Centre, 2002. (Review article)
6. Feig SA, Hendrick RE. Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:119-24. (Review article)
7. Echlund GW. The art of mammographic positioning, in radiological diagnosis of breast diseases. Berlin: Springer, 1997.
8. Faulk RM, Sickles EA. Efficacy of spot compression-magnificatin and tangential views in mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses. Radiology 1992;185:87-90. (Level III evidence)
9. Feig SA. The importance of supplementary mammographic views to diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:40-1. (Review article)
10. Berkowitz JE, Gatewood OM, Gayler BW. Equivocal mammographic findings: evaluation with spot compression. Radiology 1989;171:369-71. (Level IV evidence)
11. Barratt A, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review. Med J Aust 2002;176:266-71. (Review article)
12. Breast cancer size and nodal status. Cancer monitoring No 2. Canberra National Breast Cancer Centre; Australasian Association of Cancer Registries; BreastScreen Australia; Department of Health and Aged Care; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, October 2001.
13. Foxcroft LM, Evans EB, Joshua HK, Hirst C. Breast cancers invisible on mammography. Aust NZ J Surg 2000;70:162-7. (Level III evidence)
14. NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre. The investigation of a new breast symptom: a guide for general practitioners. Woolloomooloo (NSW): NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre, 1997. (Evidence based guideline)
15. Moss S. Should women under 50 be screened for breast cancer? Br J Cancer 2004;91:413-7. (Review article)
16. Taylor R, Morrell S, Estoesta J, Brassil A. Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in New South Wales, Australia. Cancer Causes and Control 2004;15:543-50. (Level II evidence). Click here to view reference
17. Morris A, Pommier RF, Schmidt WA, Shih RL, Alexander PW, Vetto JT. Accurate Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses by the Triple Test Score. Arch Surg 1998;133:930-34. (Level I evidence). Click here to view reference
18. Steinberg JL, Trudeau ME, Ryder DE, et al. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer. Canadian Journal of Surgery 1996;39:302-11. (Level II/III evidence)
19. Vetto JT, Pommier RF, Schmidt WA, Eppich H, Alexander PW. Diagnosis of Palpable Breast Lesions in Younger Women by the Modified Triple Test Score is Accurate and Cost Effective. Arch Surg 1996;131:967-74. (Level II evidence). Click here to view reference
20. Vetto J, Pommier RF, Schmidt WA, et al. Use of the "Triple Test" for Palpable Breast Lesions Yields High Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost Savings. Am J Surg 1995;169:519-22. (Level I evidence). Click here to view reference
21. Bulter JA, Vargas HI, Worthen N, Wilson SE. Accuracy of Combined Clinical-Mammographic-Cytologic Diagnosis of Dominant Breast Masses. Arch Surg 1990;125:893-6. (Level III evidence)

File Formats

Some documents for download on this website are in a Portable Document Format (PDF). To read these files you might need to download Adobe® Acrobat Reader.