Diagnostic Imaging Pathways - Suspected Colorectal Neoplasm

References

1. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Colorectal cancer screening: recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
   CMAJ 2001; 165:206-8. (Review article)
   
2. Rex DK, Lieberman D. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:140-1413. (Review article) Click here to view reference
3. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and propsed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005; 237:893-904. (Level II evidence) Click here to view reference
4. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Int Med 2005; 142:635-650. (Level III evidence) Click here to view reference
5. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Comparison of radiologists’ confidence in excluding significant colorectal neoplasia with multidetector-row CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema. Br J Radiol 2006; 79:208-215. (Level II evidence) Click here to view reference
6. Rockey DC, Paulsen EK, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005;365 : 305-311 (Level III evidence)
7. Wald C, Scheirey CD, Tran TM, et al. An update on imaging of colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2006; 86:819-847. (Review article)
8. Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2006; 239:313-316. (Review article) Click here to view reference
9. Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M, et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006; 239:457-463. (Level II evidence)
10. Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 2006; 239:464-471. (Level II evidence) Click here to view reference
11. Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, et al. Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR 2006; 186:96-103. (Level II evidence)
12. Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. Colonic distension and patient comfort at screening CT colonography; comparison of patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery. AJR 2006; 186:1491-1496. (Level II evidence)
13. Barish MA, Rocha TC. Multislice CT colonography: current status and limitations. Radiol Clin N Am 2005; 43:1049-1062. (Review article)
14. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA. Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 2005; 129:328-337. (Level IV evidence) Click here to view reference
15. Iannoccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterol 2004; 127:1300-1311. (Level III evidence) Click here to view reference
16. Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, et al. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study.
    Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96:394-400. (Level IV evidence)
    
17. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291:1713-1719. (Level II evidence)
18. Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 2000; 47:126-130. (Level IV evidence)
19. Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Ruckert JC, et al. Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 2005; 236:184-188. (Level II evidence)
20. Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, et al. The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:169–172. (Level II evidence)
21. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:525–530. (Level II evidence)
22. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, et al. Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 2003; 229:99-108. (Level II evidence)
23. Bruzzi JF, Moss AC, Brennan DD, et al. Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:2264-70. (Level II evidence)

File Formats

Some documents for download on this website are in a Portable Document Format (PDF). To read these files you might need to download Adobe® Acrobat Reader.