Skip To Content
 

Diagnostic Imaging Pathways - Staging of Renal Cell Carcinoma

PathwaysHome
Flow Chart
Image gallery
Teaching Points
References
PDF Version

References

  1. Zagoria RJ, Bechtold RE. The role of imaging in staging renal adenocarcinoma. Seminars in US, CT, and MRI 1997;18(2):91-9.
  2. Benson MA, Haaga JR, Resnick MI. Staging renal carcinoma. What is sufficient? Arch Surg 1989;124(1):71-3. (Level II/III evidence)
  3. Dinney CPN, Lannon SG, Awad SA, et al. Analysis of imaging modalities, staging systems, and prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1992;39(2):122-9. (Level II evidence). Click here to view reference
  4. Johnson CD, Dunnick NR, Cohan RH, et al. Renal adenocarcinoma: CT staging of 100 tumours. AJR 1987;148(1):59-63. (Level III evidence)
  5. Fein AB, Lee JKT, Balfe DM. Diagnosis and staging of renal carcinoma: a comparison of MR imaging and CT. AJR 1987;148(4):749-53. (Level II/III evidence)
  6. Habboub HK, Abu-Yousef MM, Williams RD, et al. Accuracy of color Doppler sonography in assessing venous thrombus extension in renal cell carcinoma. AJR 1997;168:267-71. (Level III evidence)
  7. Kallman DA, King BF, Hattery RR, et al. Renal vein and inferior vena cava tumour thrombus in renal cell carcinoma: CT, US, MRI, and venacavography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:240-7. (Level II evidence). Click here to view reference
  8. Didier D, Racle A, Etievent JP, et al. Tumour thrombus of the inferior vena cava secondary to malignant abdominal neoplasms: US and CT evaluation. Radiology 1987;162:83-9. (Level III/IVevidence)
  9. Schwerk WB, Schwerk WN, Rodeck G. Venous renal tumour extension: a prospective US evaluation. Radiology 1985;156:491-5. (Level II evidence). Click here to view reference
  10. Hricak H, Thoeni RF, Carroll PR, et al. Detection and staging of renal neoplasms: a reassessment of MR imaging. Radiology 1988;166;643-9. (Level III evidence)
  11. Goldfarb DA, Novick AC, Lorig R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of vena caval tumor thrombi: a comparative study with venacavography and computerized tomography scanning. J Urol 1990;144:1100-4. (Level III evidence)
  12. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Magro CM, et al. Renal cancer staging: comparison of contrast enhanced CT and gadolinium enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and gradient echo MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3(4):597-602.
  13. Horan JJ, Robertson VN, Choyke PL, et al. The detection of renal carcinoma extension into the renal vein and the inferior vena cava: a prospective comparison of venography and MRI. J Urol 1989;142(4):943-7. (Level II/III evidence)
  14. Lim DJ, Carter MF. Computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pulmonary metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1993;150(4):1112-4. (Level III evidence)
  15. Campell RJ, Broaddus SB, Leadbetter GW Jr. Staging of renal carcinoma: cost effectiveness of routine pre-operative bone scans. Urology 1985;25(3):326-9. (Level III evidence)

Further Reading

  1. Fritzsche PJ, Millar C. Multimodality approach to staging renal cell carcinoma. Urol Radiol 1992;14:3-7.

File Formats

Some documents for download on this website are in a Portable Document Format (PDF). To read these files you might need to download Adobe® Acrobat Reader.

Get Adobe Reader